DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-026
NAME
CURRENT DD-214
RELIEF REQUESTED
RELIEF GRANTED
BY DRB
ADMIN
CORRECTIONS
TIS 13 yrs, 7 months, 8 days
Policy Implications _| None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Trial and Conviction with Civil Authorities in 2003. The
applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record was available for review. The Separation Package and
administrative separation board proceedings were not available for the Board to review. The Board utilized
available information contained in electronic records and documents submitted by the applicant.
In 2001, the applicant committed a Class C Felony. The Offense stemmed from Criminal Mistreatment of a
dependent child. In 1999 and 2002, the applicant was referred by the command for the domestic difficulties.
Thereafter in 2003, the Administrative Separation Board convened to review the applicant’s record to
determine retention for further service. The other adverse items prior to the 2001 calendar year were 6
Unsatisfactory conduct evaluations that were a result of financial irresponsibility, an inability to carry out
routine duties, and an alcohol incident.
The Psychological evaluations provided by the applicant indicated that the Physician felt that the applicant was
unrealistic about the family problems to the point where a parent separation was recommended. There was no
favorable evidence or recommendation with the Psychiatrist evaluation that suggested confidence in future
parenting to correct the dire situation. After the Administrative Separation Board, the applicant was separated
with an Other Than Honorable discharge.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 034
The applicant made the request for the separation shortly after. Aside from the administrative error, the Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Due to the administrative error made, a Honorable Discharge will be issued as directed by PSC (epm).
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 025
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-025 CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, GNC, Unacceptable Conduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Change Narrative Reason for Separation; Upgrade RE code BY DRB CORRECTIONS TIS | 17 yrs, 4 months, 2 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unacceptable Conduct due to Inaptitude. The applicant’s final 9 enlisted employee evaluations resulted in a Not Recommended for Advancement from 2001-2005. The Separation Package...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 013
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-013 Honorable, M1000.6A, 12-B-9, JHJ, Unsatisfactory Performance, RE4 Upgrade Re code; Change Narrative Reason to Parenthood None Amend Block 15b on DD214 to reflect applicant as a High School Graduate TIS 1 yr, 6 months, 3 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant received Non-Judicial punishment on three separate occasions for repeated unauthorized absences, disobedience to check with supervisors, damaging government...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 017
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-017 Under Honorable Conditions, |-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 [-B-17 COMDTINST M1000.4 Honorable None None TIS Policy Implications 4 yrs, | month, 8 days None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2012. The actions that led to the Discharge included Adultery with an officer’s wife, sending racially offensive texts to the other parent of their children (also a CG mbr), attempting to...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 061
In the absence of any firm documentation to support a fraudulent enlistment, or the applicant’s formal request for separation from the service, the Majority Board vote has recommended an alternate means to categorize the Narrative Reason for Separation. With regard to the Majority Vote to recommend a partial upgrade on the reentry code: An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 058
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-058 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, None Stated, JNC, Unacceptable Conduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code, SPD code, and Narrative Reason RELIEF GRANTED None BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS | 1 yr, 11 months, 11 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unacceptable Conduct in the summer of 2001, due to tardiness on several occasions, unsatisfactory grooming, substandard duty performance,...
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 024
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-024 Narrative Reason: Entry Level Separation SPD code: JGA; RE code: RE3L; Separation Authority: 12.B.20 | TIS O yrs, O months, 11 days Policy Implications __| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged with Adjustment Disorder after just 11 days at boot camp. Members separated within the first 180 days of service normally receive an ‘Uncharacterized’ discharge. The Board recommends an entry level separation due to the inability to...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 009
The applicant received an RE-4 code that bars her from future reentry into military service. A recommendation of an RE-3H is the appropriate reenlistment code to indicate that her request to voluntary separate was due to family hardship. An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 047
The applicant was counseled and taken to NJP for larceny in the Spring of 2001. Therefore, the board recommends relief based on the consistency of these separations, and noting that the JKN code was established to separate individuals for a pattern of misconduct stemming solely from minor disciplinary infractions. Also of note, from an administrative standpoint, the board notes the inconsistency of the applicant’s Entry Into Service Date on the DD-214 worksheet.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 005
In the Fall of 2002, the applicant was found guilty at NJP for illegal use of the government credit card, and assaulting/threatening a fellow Petty Officer. However, the character of service standard for separations with the SPD code of JKN normally results in an Under Honorable Conditions discharge. The reason of Frequent Involvement of a Discreditable Nature is not an official Narrative Reason to be used on the DD-214.